Voices Behind the Curtain - Part 4
An Editor's Note from CobbProb.com
This explainer is provided by CobbProb as a public-interest resource. We received the referenced NDA through open distribution in a delegate group chat and did not sign or agree to its terms. This analysis is offered in good faith, for educational and civic engagement purposes. We do not claim legal authority, but we believe in transparency, accountability, and empowering others to make informed decisions.
The full NDA is available here: https://files.catbox.moe/7jp6fz.pdf
You can also learn more about this topic by reading our previous NDA Story.
The NDA That Doesn’t Protect the People It Claims To
A CobbProb explainer on what the Georgia Republican Party’s Non-Disclosure and Non-Disparagement Agreement really means - and who it protects.
The Georgia Republican Party (GRP) requires certain candidates for state Party office to sign a Non-Disclosure and Non-Disparagement Agreement (NDA) in order to access the official delegate list — a list that includes the names, contact information, and personal data of grassroots Republicans across the state.
The NDA explicitly defines this delegate information as both Confidential Information and a Trade Secret. It is framed as a protective measure to safeguard the privacy and integrity of delegates like you and me.
I am one of those delegates.
I am also a County Precinct Chair.
Despite these safeguards, a situation occurred in which a delegate named in that list was publicly disparaged by someone actively campaigning for state Party leadership — including a false implication of criminal behavior.
That delegate had never sent the individual any messages.
They were never contacted privately for clarification.
They were never issued an apology.
But the implication spread, unchallenged.
When the delegate asked GRP leadership for clarity or recourse under the NDA, the Party responded that:
Delegates are not considered covered by the agreement
County Chairs and Precinct Officers are not considered agents of the Party under the NDA
Only the Party itself has authority to enforce the NDA
No action would be taken
🧠 Ask Yourself
If a delegate can be falsely accused and the Party does nothing,
what’s the point of the Non-disparagement Clause?
What the GRP NDA Actually Contains:
A clause declaring the delegate list — including contact info — to be Confidential Information and a Trade Secret
A 3-year non-disparagement clause that prohibits signers from criticizing the GRP or its agents
Language that grants the GRP sole power to enforce the agreement — while offering no protection to the delegates it claims to cover
🧠 Ask Yourself
If the NDA protects the Party’s secrets and silences its critics…
but doesn’t protect the people listed in it - who is it really for?
What That Means for You:
If you are a delegate, your contact info is protected, but your reputation is not
If someone uses their platform during a GRP leadership race to disparage you, the NDA does not help you
Even if your name is on the list the NDA was created to shield, you are not shielded when it matters most
🧠 Ask Yourself
If your name is protected on a list,
but not when someone drags it through the mud - is that really protection?
What This Really Is
This NDA is not a mutual protection agreement.
It is a one-directional instrument of control.
It limits what signers can say about the Party.
It grants access to private delegate information.
But it provides no remedy if that access is misused - or if a delegate’s name and reputation are publicly harmed.
The NDA wasn’t written to protect the delegates.
It was written to protect the institution - from the people who want to serve it.
🧠 Ask Yourself
If the NDA is supposed to protect your identity,
why doesn’t it protect you when candidates who are required to sign it publicly harm your name?